This has been due, in no small degree, to the influence of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s critically acclaimed Epistemology of the Closet. Working from classic texts of. Epistemology of the Closet has ratings and 54 reviews. Khush said: ‘ Epistemology of the closet’ is an informative and interesting book. It is i. Buy Epistemology of the Closet 2Rev Ed by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery.
|Published (Last):||21 January 2010|
|PDF File Size:||9.80 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Sinners, and Jesus Christ. And while such binaries or oppositions kosofsjy present in closett, things are not always as clear cut. Nonetheless, it is probably precisely those readers who could learn the most from Epistemology of the Closetwhich reestablishes Sedgwick’s position as one of the most important thinkers in American gay studies. Topics Gender A book that changed me.
T This is definitely a good analysis of the function of the closet in homosexuality.
Epistemology of the Closet by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick. As Sedgwick said when appalled conservative commentators rejected her queer reading of literary greats: As is often my problem, it is difficult to review a book so seminal a self-conscious word choice, not ignoring the potential for “germinal” to be used as a synonym and so fundamental to so many strains of thoughts.
Where did all this hate even come from? Sedgwick describes this book as the exploration of “promising tools and techniques for nondualistic thought and pedagogy.
This kosofksy addresses the idea that there are two views that guide sexual identity and desire: The chapter dedicated to the king of obscurity is the one closest to ‘pure’ literary analysis.
While these are not the conclusions drawn by the author who is not a ChristianI feel that they are a practical application of some of her thoughts that fit within both a Biblical framework and within the canon of queer theory. According to Sexgwick Tobina writer for Philosophy and Literature”Readers who still hanker for expository prose without digressions might on occasion be frustrated with this book, as will readers whose politics differ from Epiztemology.
Sedgwick cposet very aware that this is her approach inbuilds the main theme of instability of epistemoloyg semantic attributions into the very fabric of the text itself so that it becomes structural in more senses than one.
Account Options Sign in. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
I concede that this opinion epjstemology from an undergrad who has seldom encountered literary theory in a classroom setting shame, shame, shamebut from what I gather–“affect” is intuitive. As a group we parade and champion acceptance, but behind the confines of our paper partitions, we do not often accept one another for our variations on the same theme.
As explained in the book, some women, according to Sedgwick, call themselves ” lesbians ” yet they do not identify at all with the term “gay”. More than any other book, Epistemology of the Closet has probably had the greatest influence on geographical eoistemology on sexualities. And will that rhetoric of homophobia and hatred ever truly be extricated from our language?
Epistemology of the Closet
I say this because in all reality the closet was created to prolong the believe that heterosexuality is the natural and normal way of epistdmology and to demonized anything that differs from it. Being raised in Massachusetts in the middle class, my perception of acceptance is likely to be pretty skewed toward liberal notions of equality, acceptance, etc. This comes to show the why we stayed suppressed for so long as part of the community that we are. May 11, Stef Rozitis rated it liked it Shelves: Proust and the Spectacle of the Closet 2 Chapter 2, on Billy Budd, was particularly torturous for me.
Axiom 1 — and I still smile at its devastatingly brilliant simplicity — is “people are different from each other”. While Sedgwick does frame each author and summarize each work minus Proust’s, which is understandablethe reader is expected to know them fairly well along with Foucault and have the particular texts fresh in their memory. There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Others dve imaginary friends, or teddies with personalities.
Epistemology of the Closet – Wikipedia
However, the more one reads and reflects and looks at the discourse producing machinery, one sees how easy it is to produce — very specific and largely pragmatic, not necessarily motivated by any sense of righteousness and ethics, knowledge systems and ask people to behave.
Indeed, it is only Leo Bersani who comes close in the exquisiteness of close reading encountered in this text. However, other women identify themselves as “gay women”, which disassociates themselves from the term “lesbian”. For instance, Sedwick makes the case that there are two views that guide our views of sexuality and identity. Part of this analysis implies that the closet is something that functions where others “think they know something about one that one may not know about oneself ,” which grants them excitement and power She explores in particular works by Nietzsche, Oscar Wilde, Proust, and Herman Melville, contrasting their real lives with their written works.
You dip into the Phaedrus often?
This reading thought me be proud and not live in the closet of society or allow anyone whom I love, whether queer, straight, white or colored. View all 5 comments. But the sexual component was accepted if not promoted by the ancients. Even with a year of intense graduate studies in gender and sexuality and after a year-long seminar on Nietzsche who I mention only because I find his writing is equally impenetrablethis book was a struggle at times.
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick was an American academician specializing in literary criticism and feminist analysis; she is known as one of the architects of queer theory. I wish I had read the books she discussed in it!
Return to Book Page. Epistemology of the Closet is a book published in by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwickwho is considered one rve the founders of queer studies. She’s not fighting “for” “the homosexual” as much as attempting to deconstruct the social binaries that themselves invariably result in concrete binaries.
Given how non-pellucid Sedgwick herself is, it is not surprising that Henry James should feature so prominently. Be the first to ask a question closrt Epistemology of the Closet. This makes for a reading experience that is as highly interesting as it can be frustrating. Another analogy that I came across was the fact we as queer people did fall under closet ideology.